Buying guides 7 picks
The best AI inbox tools for small teams in 2026
Missive is the best AI inbox tool for a team of two to ten, with chat inside the thread, generic IMAP and 14 USD per user and month.
The short answer
Missive
8 /10Teams of two to fifty answering customer mail together on Gmail, Outlook or plain IMAP
Key takeaways
- Missive ranks first on price, collaboration and mailbox support: 14 USD per user and month billed yearly, chat inside the thread and generic IMAP.
- Front is the only tool here with a selectable EU hosting region and a dated, itemised AI sub-processor list, but Copilot costs another 20 USD per seat.
- BoxBee wins both data protection criteria outright and is not a shared inbox, its Team tier adds shared administration rather than assignment or collision handling.
- Hiver solves adoption by living inside Gmail, but all data sits on AWS in Oregon and the privacy policy lists message bodies and attachments among what goes to AI providers.
- At three seats the monthly spread runs from 38.64 EUR for Missive to 87.00 EUR for BoxBee, and the cheapest option has the best collaboration model.
Side by side
| Rank | Product | Score | From | Best for | Strengths | Weaknesses | More |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Missive | 8/10 | €12.88per user / month billed yearly (Starter, 14 USD at 1 USD = 0.92 EUR) | Teams of two to fifty answering customer mail together on Gmail, Outlook or plain IMAP | Internal chat, assignment and collision handling inside the conversation | Every published sub-processor is in the United States, no EU hosting option | View all |
| 2 | Front | 7.9/10 | €23per seat / month billed annually (Starter, 25 USD at 1 USD = 0.92 EUR) | Support and operations teams of ten or more that need routing, SLAs and an EU hosting region | Hosting can be chosen in the US or the EU | Professional is 65 USD per seat and Copilot another 20 USD unless on Enterprise | View all |
| 3 | BoxBee | 8.2/10 | €29per seat / month (Team, minimum three seats) | Small European firms where the data protection officer decides and nobody needs a shared queue | Message body and attachments stay on the device, encrypted in the OS keystore | No shared inbox: no assignment, no internal comments, no collision handling | View all |
| 4 | Hiver | 7/10 | €23per user / month billed annually (Growth, 25 USD at 1 USD = 0.92 EUR), minimum two seats | Google Workspace support teams that want queues and SLAs without leaving Gmail | Runs inside Gmail, so there is no new inbox to learn | All data on AWS us-west-2 Oregon, no EU option, staff in India may access it | View all |
| 5 | Gmelius | 6.4/10 | €17.48per user / month billed annually (Meli, 19 USD at 1 USD = 0.92 EUR) | Small Google Workspace teams that want shared labels, kanban boards and sequences cheaply | Cheapest Gmail-native shared inbox with workflow automation | Gmail and Google Workspace only | View all |
| 6 | Shortwave | 8.5/10 | €27.60per seat / month (Business, 30 USD at 1 USD = 0.92 EUR) | Google Workspace teams whose real problem is finding things, not dividing work | Best AI search in the category over the full Gmail archive | Not a shared inbox, team plans apply to personal Gmail accounts | View all |
| 7 | Spark Mail | 7.6/10 | €19.08per user / month billed annually (Pro) | Two person teams that want to test a shared workflow at no cost on mixed mailboxes | Real free tier, so a small team can test at no cost | Thinnest team layer here, shared drafts and delegation rather than a queue with ownership | View all |
Scroll the table sideways to see every column.
- From
- €12.88
- Best for
- Teams of two to fifty answering customer mail together on Gmail, Outlook or plain IMAP
Our take
Chat in the thread, clean assignment and real IMAP support at 14 USD per user and month. The AI is bring-your-own across three providers, which puts you in control of the processor and the bill.
Strengths
- Internal chat, assignment and collision handling inside the conversation
- Generic IMAP plus Gmail, Outlook, WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram and SMS
- Choose OpenAI, Anthropic Claude or Google Gemini with your own key
- Lowest entry price here and a 30 day trial without a card
Weaknesses
- Every published sub-processor is in the United States, no EU hosting option
- DPA is request only, by email
- AI credits billed separately with no per-plan quota published
- Triage automation is thinner than in Fyxer or BoxBee
- From
- €23
- Best for
- Support and operations teams of ten or more that need routing, SLAs and an EU hosting region
Our take
The easiest shared inbox to get through a data protection review, and the deepest routing engine. Also the one most likely to blow a small team budget.
Strengths
- Hosting can be chosen in the US or the EU
- Dated sub-processor list naming OpenAI, Google, Azure, AWS and TypeSafe AI for AI functionality
- Published DPA, SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001
- Mature routing, SLA rules and omnichannel including WhatsApp and voice
Weaknesses
- Professional is 65 USD per seat and Copilot another 20 USD unless on Enterprise
- Starter is capped at ten seats and one channel type
- Monthly billing figures are not published
- Generic IMAP is not named on the pricing or security pages
- From
- €29
- Best for
- Small European firms where the data protection officer decides and nobody needs a shared queue
Our take
The only product here that does not transmit the message body, and the only one using a European model provider. Buy it as three well-protected personal clients on one invoice, not as a team inbox, because the shared inbox features do not exist.
Strengths
- Message body and attachments stay on the device, encrypted in the OS keystore
- Mistral AI in Paris, EU region, is the only named AI sub-processor
- Controller in Luxembourg, so the GDPR applies directly
- Plain IMAP and SMTP, works on the mailboxes you already have
Weaknesses
- No shared inbox: no assignment, no internal comments, no collision handling
- Most expensive entry here at 29.00 EUR per seat with a three seat minimum
- No customer-facing data processing agreement published
- Short track record compared with Front or Missive
- From
- €23
- Best for
- Google Workspace support teams that want queues and SLAs without leaving Gmail
Our take
The best answer to the adoption problem, and the clearest vendor about what it sends to a model. The honesty is welcome, the location is not.
Strengths
- Runs inside Gmail, so there is no new inbox to learn
- In the Gmail variant the vendor states storage never exceeds one hour for 99 percent of messages
- Dated sub-processor list naming OpenAI, Microsoft, Pinecone and Langchain
- Hiver Omni adds Outlook, Zoho, chat, voice and WhatsApp
Weaknesses
- All data on AWS us-west-2 Oregon, no EU option, staff in India may access it
- Privacy policy lists message body and attachments among data sent to AI providers
- DPA is request only and not linked from the public GDPR page
- Two seat minimum and only a 7 day trial
- From
- €17.48
- Best for
- Small Google Workspace teams that want shared labels, kanban boards and sequences cheaply
Our take
The budget shared inbox for a Gmail-only team, strong on boards and sequences, weak on AI and on published documentation.
Strengths
- Cheapest Gmail-native shared inbox with workflow automation
- Kanban boards on top of Gmail labels keep the pipeline in the inbox
- Email sequences and shared drafts in one subscription
- Swiss vendor rather than a US contracting party
Weaknesses
- Gmail and Google Workspace only
- No DPA, sub-processor list or hosting location published
- 7 day trial and no free plan
- Plan caps at five then fifty users make the price steps abrupt
- From
- €27.60
- Best for
- Google Workspace teams whose real problem is finding things, not dividing work
Our take
Buy it if your team cannot find anything in years of mail. Do not buy it expecting a shared inbox, because team plans sit on individual Gmail accounts.
Strengths
- Best AI search in the category over the full Gmail archive
- AI threads allow follow-up questions inside a conversation
- Says most AI workloads run on hardware it controls
- Commits that mail content never trains third-party models
Weaknesses
- Not a shared inbox, team plans apply to personal Gmail accounts
- Gmail and Google Workspace only, Microsoft 365 unsupported
- Data transferred to servers in the United States, no EU option
- No published DPA or sub-processor list, and 30 USD per seat
- From
- €19.08
- Best for
- Two person teams that want to test a shared workflow at no cost on mixed mailboxes
Our take
A free way to find out whether shared drafts and delegation are enough. If they are not, you need a real queue, and that is Missive or Front.
Strengths
- Real free tier, so a small team can test at no cost
- Spark Mail Limited in Dublin with a published DPA naming the Irish DPC
- Generic IMAP, Exchange, Outlook, Yahoo, iCloud and Gmail
- States your data trains no AI model and providers retain inputs 30 days at most
Weaknesses
- Thinnest team layer here, shared drafts and delegation rather than a queue with ownership
- The DPA says the full sub-processor list is deliberately not public
- Mail content and attachments go to Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Anthropic and Google Vertex AI
- Data sits on US and EEA servers with no selectable EU-only option
Short answer
For a team of two to ten people sharing one mailbox, Missive is the best AI inbox tool in 2026: real collaboration inside the thread, generic IMAP support and 14 USD per user and month billed yearly. Front wins if you need routing, SLAs and a selectable EU hosting region, and BoxBee wins if the deciding question is where the mail text is processed, as long as you accept that it is not a shared inbox.
How we ranked
Five criteria, measurable, fixed before any product appears below. A shared inbox is a different purchase from a personal AI client, so the weights are different from our ranking of AI email clients.
- Where is the mail text processed, and under which jurisdiction? The entity that holds the bytes, and the law that applies to it.
- Is a European model provider used? Mistral and the EU regions of the hyperscalers count. OpenAI, Anthropic and Google in a US region do not.
- Price per seat and month at three seats, net, cheapest paid plan, USD converted at 1 USD = 0.92 EUR, including minimum seat counts.
- Does the team genuinely share one inbox? Assignment, internal comments on the thread, collision handling so two people do not answer the same customer.
- Does it work on the mailboxes you already have? Google Workspace, Microsoft 365 or generic IMAP, without a migration.
One result is worth stating before you read on. BoxBee wins criteria 1, 2 and 5 outright and is the only product here with a European model provider, but it loses criterion 4 completely: the Team tier gives you shared administration and billing, not a shared inbox. It has no assignment, no internal thread comments and no collision handling. We rank it third rather than first for that reason, and we say so because that is the only version of this list worth publishing.
The seven tools, compared
| # | Product | From (EUR / seat / month) | Shared inbox | Processing | Mailboxes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Missive | 12.88 | Yes, chat in thread | AWS, United States | IMAP, Gmail, Outlook |
| 2 | Front | 23.00 | Yes, with routing and SLAs | US or EU, selectable | Gmail, Microsoft 365 |
| 3 | BoxBee | 29.00, minimum 3 seats | No, shared administration only | Body on device, Mistral in EU | IMAP and SMTP |
| 4 | Hiver | 23.00, minimum 2 seats | Yes, inside Gmail | AWS Oregon, United States | Gmail, or any provider via Omni |
| 5 | Gmelius | 17.48 | Yes, shared labels and boards | Not published | Gmail only |
| 6 | Shortwave | 27.60 | Partly, team plans on personal inboxes | Google Cloud, United States | Gmail only |
| 7 | Spark Mail | 19.08 | Partly, shared drafts and delegation | US and EEA servers | IMAP, Exchange, Gmail |
1. Missive, the cheapest real shared inbox
Missive puts internal chat inside the conversation, so a colleague discusses a customer mail next to the mail rather than in a forwarded thread. Assignment is clean, collision handling works, and the same inbox takes WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram and SMS. Starter is 14 USD per user and month billed yearly for up to five users, which is the lowest entry price in this list, and the trial is 30 days without a card. The AI is deliberately bring-your-own: you pick OpenAI, Anthropic Claude or Google Gemini and supply a key, which means you control the processor and the cost. The documentation is honest that email content is sent to the provider you chose and that OpenAI and Anthropic may retain API data for up to 30 days for abuse monitoring. Every sub-processor on the published GDPR page is in the United States and the DPA arrives by email on request.
2. Front, the one with an EU hosting region
Front is the enterprise end of this market and it is the only vendor here that lets you choose where the data lives: it supports hosting in the US or the EU. Its sub-processor list is dated, itemised and names OpenAI, Google, Azure, AWS and TypeSafe AI with the purpose AI-enabled functionality, tying the processing location to the region you picked. The DPA is published, and it carries SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001. Routing, SLA rules and omnichannel coverage are in a different league from Missive's. The price is the catch. Starter at 25 USD per seat is limited to ten seats and a single channel type, Professional is 65 USD, and Copilot is another 20 USD per seat unless you are on Enterprise. Autopilot is billed per conversation from 0.39 USD, so heavy automation is hard to budget.
3. BoxBee, best on data protection, not a shared inbox
BoxBee is the only product in this list that does not transmit the message body at all. Its published privacy policy keeps subject, body and attachments on the device in the operating system keystore, and names one AI sub-processor: Mistral AI in Paris, hosted in the EU region, contractually without training. The controller sits in Luxembourg, so the GDPR applies directly rather than through an adequacy decision. For a small European firm where the works council or the data protection officer decides, nothing else here is close. What you do not get is the thing this list is about. The Team tier at 29.00 EUR per seat with a three seat minimum adds shared administration, not a shared mailbox, so there is no assignment, no internal comment on a thread and no collision handling. It is also the most expensive entry price here. Buy it as three good personal clients with one invoice and a defensible processing chain, and read what a DPA has to say before you sign.
4. Hiver, the shared inbox your staff already know
Hiver's advantage is that there is nothing to adopt: the shared inbox is Gmail, with queues, assignment and SLAs added by a Chrome extension. For the Gmail variant the vendor states it does not store mail permanently and that storage never exceeds one hour for 99 percent of messages, which is a genuinely unusual claim in this category. Hiver Omni, the standalone app, adds Outlook, Zoho, chat, voice and WhatsApp, and does store mail content. Growth is 25 USD per user and month on annual billing with a two seat minimum. The data protection picture is the weakness: everything sits on AWS in Oregon with no EU option, staff in India may access it, the privacy policy lists the message body and attachments among the data sent to AI providers, and the DPA is request only.
5. Gmelius, the budget Gmail shared inbox
Gmelius adds shared labels, kanban boards and email sequences to Gmail from a Swiss vendor, with the entry plan at 19 USD per user and month on annual billing for up to five users. The boards are the reason to pick it: if work arrives as mail and leaves as a task, the pipeline lives where the work is instead of in a second tool. It is Gmail only, the trial is 7 days with no free plan, and the published documentation stops at the pricing page, so a sub-processor list, a hosting statement and a DPA all have to be requested in writing. Treat the AI as automation rather than as a model-driven assistant.
6. Shortwave, the best AI, sold per seat
Shortwave sells Business, Premier and Max per seat, but what you are buying is the best AI search in the category on each person's own Gmail account, not a shared queue. If your team's problem is that nobody can find anything in three years of mail, this is the answer, and no competitor is near it. If the problem is that two people answer the same customer, it is not. Gmail and Google Workspace only, Microsoft 365 explicitly unsupported, data in US data centres, and no published DPA or sub-processor list. At 30 USD per seat it is also the most expensive personal client here. See BoxBee against Shortwave.
7. Spark Mail, the free tier and the EU contract
Spark earns a place for two reasons: a genuine free tier, so a two person team can test the workflow at no cost, and an Irish contracting entity with a published DPA naming the Irish Data Protection Commission. Pro at 19.08 EUR per user and month on annual billing adds shared drafts and delegation. The team layer is the thinnest here, closer to collaboration on drafts than to a queue with ownership. The privacy policy names Azure OpenAI, OpenAI, Anthropic and Google Vertex AI, mail content including attachments goes to them, and the DPA states that the full sub-processor list is deliberately not public.
How to choose in one pass
Start with criterion 4, because it is binary. If two people must never answer the same customer twice, you need Missive, Front, Hiver or Gmelius, and the rest of the list is out whatever else it does well. Then apply criterion 1. If the processing location is a hard constraint, you are down to Front with the EU region, and you should expect to pay Professional prices for it. If the location is a hard constraint and the budget is small, the honest answer is that no shared inbox in this list meets both, and the workable compromise is three BoxBee seats plus a discipline about who owns which sender.
On price at three seats, the monthly spread is real: Missive 38.64 EUR, Gmelius 52.44 EUR, Hiver and Front 69.00 EUR, Shortwave 82.80 EUR, BoxBee 87.00 EUR. The cheapest option is also the one with the best collaboration model, which does not happen often in software.
For what these tools genuinely do and do not do, see what an AI email assistant actually does. Vendors can get listed and be assessed against the same five criteria.
Weekly, Thursday morning, Central European Time.
The Thinking briefing
One email a week: what changed in European business software, which prices moved, and which comparison we published. No sales mail.
Questions and answers
What is the best shared inbox with AI for a small team?
Can a shared inbox keep our mail inside the EU?
Does BoxBee work as a team inbox?
How much does a shared AI inbox cost for three people?
Which tools need a Gmail account?
Sources
- [1] Missive pricing accessed 2026-11-11
- [2] Missive billing and plans accessed 2026-11-11
- [3] Missive AI documentation accessed 2026-11-11
- [4] Missive GDPR and sub-processors accessed 2026-11-11
- [5] Front pricing accessed 2026-11-11
- [6] Front security accessed 2026-11-11
- [7] Front list of sub-processors accessed 2026-11-11
- [8] Front Data Processing Addendum accessed 2026-11-11
- [9] BoxBee pricing accessed 2026-11-11
- [10] BoxBee privacy policy accessed 2026-11-11
- [11] BoxBee features accessed 2026-11-11
- [12] Hiver pricing accessed 2026-11-11
- [13] Hiver privacy policy accessed 2026-11-11
- [14] Hiver third party sub-processors accessed 2026-11-11
- [15] Hiver security accessed 2026-11-11
- [16] Gmelius pricing accessed 2026-11-11
- [17] Shortwave pricing accessed 2026-11-11
- [18] Shortwave security and privacy accessed 2026-11-11
- [19] Spark pricing accessed 2026-11-11
- [20] Spark Data Processing Agreement accessed 2026-11-11
Thinking is published by TTA Technologies in Luxembourg, which also builds LUXPOS, Salonify, BoxBee and DepotGest. Read the full disclosure policy


